July | 2012 | Gaia-Health.link

Autoimmune diseases are a modern plague, causing untold suffering and early, painful death. This study clearly documents that vaccinations are a primary cause.

by Heidi Stevenson

A major curse of modern living is the advent of mass suffering from chronic autoimmune diseases. They have become the way we live and the way we die. Now, a study published in PLoS One has documented that vaccinations may be causing this plague.

The study, Self-Organized Criticality Theory of Autoimmunity, produced a wide variety of tests on animals to examine the fact that, as they stated:

Repeated immunization with antigen causes systemic autoimmunity in mice otherwise not prone to spontaneous autoimmune diseases.

They concluded:

Systemic autoimmunity appears to be the inevitable consequence of over-stimulating the host’s immune ‘system’ by repeated immunization with antigen, to the levels that surpass system’s self-organized criticality.

In other words, they found that, not only is vaccination a possible or even probable cause of autoimmune disorders, but that:

Chronic diseases are the inevitable result of vaccinations!

In their introduction, the authors further describe their discovery:

The method we have chosen was to stimulate the system maximally by antigen to the levels far beyond its steady-state just like testing the capability of automobile. In a perfectly reproducible experiments in which the mice not prone to autoimmune diseases were immunized repeatedly with antigen, we have unexpectedly and surprisingly discovered that overstimulation of immune system beyond its self-organized criticality inevitably leads to systemic autoimmunity. [Emphasis mine.]

The mice used in this experiment were ones bred to have no autoimmune disorders, so the ability to stress them to the point of inevitably suffering from autoimmune disorders is particularly significant.

Study Findings

T-cells, commonly called killer cells, are a type of lymphocyte (white blood cell). They are a critical part of the immune system. CD4⁺ cells are a type of T-cell. They initiate the body’s response to infections. The study found that overstimulation of CD4⁺cells results in the induction of autoantibodies, that is, antibodies that attack the self instead of invaders. That is virtually the definition of an autoimmune disease.

The authors specifically found tissue injury like that of the disease lupus erythematosus and other autoimmune disorders.

The researchers used Staphylococcus entertoxin B (SEB) to inject mice bred for their lack of autoimmunity. Injection initially resulted in loss of energy in a particular kind of CD4⁺ cell, Vß8⁺. These cells recovered through 7 cycles of injections. However, the Vß8⁺cells were unable to recover after the 8^th injection. At that point, they started to produce the autoantibodies.

They found the following autoantibodies:

IgG-rheumatoid factor (RF)
IgM-RF
Anti-Sm antibody
RF reactive against galactose-deficient IgG

As the term rheumatoid factor seems to imply, these are significant in rheumatoid arthritis, an autoimmune disorder. The last item, anti-galactose deficiency IgG antibodies, is used as a marker to diagnose the disease.

The researchers also showed that ovalbumin (OVA) and keyhole limpet hemocyanin, also induce autoimmunity after the 8^th injection.

Autoimmune Tissue Damage

The authors included graphic images of autoimmune tissue damage from the experiments.

The image on the right is of eosinophils, a type of white blood cell, in the kidneys of mice immunized 12 times. Both images are at 400X. The image on the left is (PBS) refers to a nonantigen injected. It shows grossly enlarged eosinophils resulting from autoimmune damage.

Immune complexes (ICs) of proteinuria are indications of autoantibodies. The image to the left shows the development of ICs of Immunoglobulin G (IgG), C3 (indicative of lupus erythematosus), and OVA in mice injected 12 times. As in the previous image, PBS refers to the results of the injection of a nonantigen, and the results on the bottom are injection of the known antigen, OVA. The image is of a microscopic magnification of 400X.

The next image on the right shows infiltration of CD8 cells in the kidneys and anti-interferon (IFN) autoantibodies in mice injected 12 times. The image is of a microscopic magnification of 300X. As in the prior images, PBS refers to injection of a nonantigen and OVA is the injected antigen.

Types of Damage Found

The authors state that they found the following types of tissue damage:

Diffuse membranous (wire-loop) glomerulonephritis in the kidney.
Proliferative glomerulonephritis in the kidney.
Infiltration of plasma cells around hepatic bile ducts.
Enlarged lymphoid follicles with marked germinal center in the spleen.
Occasional lymphocyte infiltration into the salivary glands.
Lymphoid cell infiltration into the thyroid
Perivascular infiltration of neutrophils and macrophages into the skin dermis of the auricle.
Positive lupus band test.

Autoimmune Diseases Are Infectious

The authors also reported that injection of the damaged CD4⁺ cells into the autoimmune disease-safe mice transferred the damage to them. The implications of that are huge. It means that no one suffering from an autoimmune disorder should be allowed to donate blood, because they could also be donating their diseases.

Implications

The researchers concluded:

Systemic autoimmunity appears to be the inevitable consequence of over-stimulating the host’s immune ‘system’ by repeated immunization with antigen, to the levels that surpass system’s self-organized criticality.

Starting with the A’s, autoimmune diseases include:

Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis (ADEM)
Acute necrotizing hemorrhagic leukoencephalitis
Addison’s disease
Agammaglobulinemia
Alopecia areata
Amyloidosis
Ankylosing spondylitis
Anti-GBM/Anti-TBM nephritis
Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS)
Autoimmune angioedema
Autoimmune aplastic anemia
Autoimmune dysautonomia
Autoimmune hepatitis
Autoimmune hyperlipidemia
Autoimmune immunodeficiency
Autoimmune inner ear disease (AIED)
Autoimmune myocarditis
Autoimmune pancreatitis
Autoimmune retinopathy
Autoimmune thrombocytopenic purpura (ATP)
Autoimmune thyroid disease
Autoimmune urticaria
Axonal & neuronal neuropathies

Then comes the rest of the alphabet, including lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, chronic fatigue syndrome, Guillain-Barré syndrome, and frankly, too many others to list here.

Here’s a more complete list.

With this information in hand, can there be any justification for the current extreme vaccination schedule that exists in virtually all nations today? Can there be any wonder that the industrialized nations giving the greatest number of vaccinations are those with the greatest infant mortality rates?

The information exposed by this study clarifies that there can be no justification for the push to vaccinate. There is also no justification for the lack of research into the effects of the full schedule of vaccines.

With this information, the routine injection of vaccines into children or adults is clearly unjustified.

Source:

Self-Organized Criticality Theory of Autoimmunity, by Ken Tsumiyama, Yumi Miyazaki, Shunichi Shiozawa

Tagged autoimmune disease vaccination, autoimmune diseases, autoimmune study, autoimmune vaccine study, big pharma, pharmaceutical drugs, science, vaccination autoimmune disease, vaccination chronic disease, vaccinations cause autoimmune disease, vaccine, vaccine study, vaccines, vaccines cause autoimmune disease

There seems to be little investigation into the SIDS phenonmenon, in spite of the fact that it is the leading cause of death in babies born healthy! Could that be because it’s caused by vaccines?

by Heidi Stevenson

In the study documenting higher infant death rates with greater numbers of vaccines⁽¹⁾, the authors also investigated sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). This is a new classification of death for babies found dead for no known reason. It was implemented in 1973.

There seems to be little investigation into the SIDS phenonmenon, in spite of the fact that it is the leading cause of death from 1-12 months of age!

As the authors, Neil Z. Miller and Gary S. Goldman, state:

Prior to contemporary vaccination programs, ‘Crib death’ was so infrequent that it was not mentioned in infant mortality statistics. For the first time in history, most US infants were required to receive several doses of DPT, polio, measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines. Shortly thereafter, in 1969, medical certifiers presented a new medical term—sudden infant death syndrome. In 1973, the National Center for Health Statistics added a new cause-of-death category—for SIDS—to the ICD. SIDS is defined as the sudden and unexpected death of an infant which remains unexplained after a thorough investigation.

In other words, babies are dying and no one knows why—at least, officially. Miller and Goldman’s study, though, provides solid information indicating that SIDS is a result of vaccinations.

The Attempt to Hide SIDS

The authors discuss how governments have responded. Initially, SIDS was attributed to babies sleeping on their stomachs—though why that would suddenly cause babies to stop breathing, when it had never been an issue in the past, was never explored. That did appear to result in an 8.6% reduction in SIDS, but it was accompanied by an 11.2% increase in sudden unexplained infant death syndrome (SUIDS).

The authors cite several studies documenting that when fewer SIDS deaths were recorded, other unexplained infant deaths increased, resulting in no significant difference in unexplained infant deaths. They state:

A closer inspection of the more recent period from 1999 to 2001 reveals that the US postneonatal SIDS rate continued to decline, but there was no significant change in the total postneonatal mortality rate. During this period, the number of deaths attributed to
‘suffocation in bed’ and ‘unknown causes,’ increased significantly.

In other words, any apparent decrease in SIDS has been a result of fakery.

Leading Causes of Infant Death

In the United States, SIDS is officially the third leading cause of infant death. However, if you eliminate causes associated with birth defects and low birth weight, it becomes the leading cause of infant death!

The Centers for Disease Control’s (CDC’s) most recently published information regarding death rates is for 2008⁽²⁾. It indicates a total of 28,075 infant deaths. 2,350 are defined as caused by SIDS. That’s 8.4% of the total number of infant deaths.

According to information from studies reported by Miller and Goldman, by 2001 the reported SIDS death rate was 50.9/100,000, but adjusting it for causes that had previously been identified as SIDS, that rate was 75.4/100,000. If we then calculate that the real rate of death from SIDS is 48% higher. That would indicate that the true number of SIDS deaths is 3,478, 12.4% of the total number of infant deaths.

The reality is likely even worse. The authors note that there are several other categories that could include SIDS deaths, including “unspecified viral diseases, diseases of the blood, septicemia, diseases of the nervous system, anoxic brain damage, other diseases of the nervous system, diseases of the respiratory system, influenza, and unspecified diseases of the respiratory system”.

Linking SIDS to Vaccines

The question of what causes SIDS deaths doesn’t generally get examined in any serious manner. Suggesting that it’s the result of babies sleeping on their faces is ludicrous on the surface. When parents put their babies to sleep on their tummies, their faces are turned to the side. Therefore, to be able to suffocate, they must first be able to move their heads enough to turn them face-down into the mattress and blankets. It makes absolutely no sense that a baby able to do that is unable to respond if breathing is hindered. If a baby suffocates while lying on his tummy, then something has happened to keep the baby from reacting. Clearly, it’s farcical to suggest that the problem is incorrectly placing babies on their tummies to sleep!

So what actually does make sense as a cause of SIDS? Miller and Goldman cite studies that have investigated the DPT (diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus) vaccine and multiple vaccines that document a strong likelihood of vaccines being the cause.

They cite the Torch study, which shows that:

6.5% of SIDS deaths occurred within 12 hours of the DPT vaccination.
6.5% died between 12 and 24 hours, for a total of 13% within 24 hours.
13% died between 24 hours and 3 days, for a total of 26% within 3 days.
15% died between 3 days and 1 week, for a total of 37% within 1 week.
24% died between 1 and 2 weeks, for a total of 61% within 2 weeks.
9% died between 2 and 3 weeks, for a total of 70% within 3 weeks.

Further, the study noted that most DPT-unvaccincated babies who died of SIDS died during the winter months. However, most vaccinated SIDS deaths happened in association with the 2 and 4 month doses of DPT. The Torch study⁽³⁾ reported that DPT:

may be a generally unrecognized major cause of sudden infant and early childhood death, and that the risks of immunization may outweigh its potential benefits. A need for re-evaluation and possible modification of current vaccination procedures is indicated by this study.

A study by Walker et al⁽⁴⁾ found:

the SIDS mortality rate in the period zero to three days following DPT to be 7.3 times that in the period beginning 30 days after immunization.

A study by Fine and Chen⁽⁵⁾ found that the death rate of babies is nearly 8 times greater within the first 3 days of DPT vaccination.

Ottaviani et al⁽⁶⁾ investigated the death of a 3-month old baby who suddenly died after a 6-in-1 vaccination. They clearly attributed the baby’s death to the hexavalent vaccine:

Examination of the brainstem on serial sections revealed bilateral hypoplasia of the arcuate nucleus. The cardiac conduction system presented persistent fetal dispersion and resorptive degeneration. This case offers a unique insight into the possible role of hexavalent vaccine in triggering a lethal outcome in a vulnerable baby.

Vaccine Deaths

The only thing that appears to have any credible association with SIDS deaths is vaccinations. At this point, we have clear evidence that links DPT and other multivalent vaccines to SIDS, and a strong causative link is also indicated.

In spite of the massive hype claiming that vaccines are saving lives, it has been obvious that most of it is based on false evidence. Most childhood diseases had already diminished to the point of being rare or mild before vaccinations were implemented on a mass scale. It is far more credible to credit better nutrition, safer water supplies, and good sanitation for the decrease in childhood deaths. So, even if it is true that vaccines save lives, it is far less dramatic than the pro-vaccination propaganda.

Clearly, any benefits from vaccines must be balanced against the clear harm that they’re doing.

SIDS accounts by 12.4% of all infant deaths. We have strong evidence that SIDS is caused by vaccines. So, 12.4% of all infant deaths appear to be caused by vaccines. This doesn’t include the other damage done by vaccines, including autism, which is destroying the lives of millions of children around the world and resulting in enormous societal costs, which are only beginning to be recognized as many of these children grow into adulthood without the ability to function in society.

The news media is now full of cases of Big Pharma’s malfeasance. The fraud and manipulation are astounding, and the stench of their corruption in public health agencies is overpowering.

We have seen that the primary study in support of no link between autism and vaccines, the Thorsen study⁽⁷⁾, was awash in corruption⁽⁸⁾. It is simply inconceivable that the research in support of either vaccine safety or efficacy is credible. Pseudo science, a mockery of genuine scientific research, has marked most of what passes for science in association with Big Pharma.

Until we see honest research into the safety of vaccines—individually, in multivalent combinations, and in terms of the impact of the entire schedule with each additional vaccine—any parents who agree to vaccinate their children are taking risks with their lives that, if this medical system weren’t so corrupt, would be considered child endangerment and result in prison sentences.

Photo from FreeDigitalPhotos.net.

Sources:

⁽¹⁾Infant mortality rates regressed against number of vaccine doses routinely given: Is there a biochemical or synergistic toxicity?
⁽²⁾Infant Mortality Statistics from the 2008 Period Linked Birth/Infant Death Data Set
⁽³⁾Torch WC. Diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus (DPT) immu-nization: a potential cause of the sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). American Academy of Neurology, 34th Annual Meeting, Apr 25-May 1, 1982. Neurology 32(4): pt. 2
⁽⁴⁾Walker AM, Jick H, Perera DR, Thompson RS, and Knauss TA. Diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis immuniza-tion and sudden infant death syndrome. Am J Public Health 1987; 77: 945–951.
⁽⁵⁾Fine PE and Chen RT. Confounding in studies of adverse reactions to vaccines. Am J Epidemiol 1992; 136: 121–135
⁽⁶⁾Ottaviani G, Lavezze AM, and Matturri L. Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) shortly after hexavalent vaccination: another pathology in suspected SIDS? Virchows Archiv 2006; 448: 100–104.
⁽⁷⁾Thimerosal and the Occurrence of Autism: Negative Ecological Evidence From Danish Population-Based Data
⁽⁸⁾First Fraud: Dr. Poul Thorsen and the original “Danish Study”

Tagged autism vaccines, big pharma, cot death, cot death vaccines, crib death, crib death vaccines, dpt vaccine deaths, lack of vaccine research, multivalent vaccine death, pharmaceutical drugs, pharmaceuticals, pseudo-science, sids, sids dpt, sids vaccines, sudden infant death syndrome, vaccine, vaccine autism, vaccine deaths, vaccine sids, vaccines

by Heidi Stevenson

There seems to be little investigation into the SIDS phenonmenon, in spite of the fact that it is the leading cause of death from 1-12 months of age!

As the authors, Neil Z. Miller and Gary S. Goldman, state:

Prior to contemporary vaccination programs, ‘Crib death’ was so infrequent that it was not mentioned in infant mortality statistics. For the first time in history, most US infants were required to receive several doses of DPT, polio, measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines. Shortly thereafter, in 1969, medical certifiers presented a new medical term—sudden infant death syndrome. In 1973, the National Center for Health Statistics added a new cause-of-death category—for SIDS—to the ICD. SIDS is defined as the sudden and unexpected death of an infant which remains unexplained after a thorough investigation.

In other words, babies are dying and no one knows why—at least, officially. Miller and Goldman’s study, though, provides solid information indicating that SIDS is a result of vaccinations.

The Attempt to Hide SIDS

A closer inspection of the more recent period from 1999 to 2001 reveals that the US postneonatal SIDS rate continued to decline, but there was no significant change in the total postneonatal mortality rate. During this period, the number of deaths attributed to
‘suffocation in bed’ and ‘unknown causes,’ increased significantly.

In other words, any apparent decrease in SIDS has been a result of fakery.

Leading Causes of Infant Death

Linking SIDS to Vaccines

They cite the Torch study, which shows that:

6.5% of SIDS deaths occurred within 12 hours of the DPT vaccination.
6.5% died between 12 and 24 hours, for a total of 13% within 24 hours.
13% died between 24 hours and 3 days, for a total of 26% within 3 days.
15% died between 3 days and 1 week, for a total of 37% within 1 week.
24% died between 1 and 2 weeks, for a total of 61% within 2 weeks.
9% died between 2 and 3 weeks, for a total of 70% within 3 weeks.

may be a generally unrecognized major cause of sudden infant and early childhood death, and that the risks of immunization may outweigh its potential benefits. A need for re-evaluation and possible modification of current vaccination procedures is indicated by this study.

A study by Walker et al⁽⁴⁾ found:

the SIDS mortality rate in the period zero to three days following DPT to be 7.3 times that in the period beginning 30 days after immunization.

A study by Fine and Chen⁽⁵⁾ found that the death rate of babies is nearly 8 times greater within the first 3 days of DPT vaccination.

Ottaviani et al⁽⁶⁾ investigated the death of a 3-month old baby who suddenly died after a 6-in-1 vaccination. They clearly attributed the baby’s death to the hexavalent vaccine:

Examination of the brainstem on serial sections revealed bilateral hypoplasia of the arcuate nucleus. The cardiac conduction system presented persistent fetal dispersion and resorptive degeneration. This case offers a unique insight into the possible role of hexavalent vaccine in triggering a lethal outcome in a vulnerable baby.

Vaccine Deaths

Clearly, any benefits from vaccines must be balanced against the clear harm that they’re doing.

The news media is now full of cases of Big Pharma’s malfeasance. The fraud and manipulation are astounding, and the stench of their corruption in public health agencies is overpowering.

Photo from FreeDigitalPhotos.net.

Sources:

⁽¹⁾Infant mortality rates regressed against number of vaccine doses routinely given: Is there a biochemical or synergistic toxicity?
⁽²⁾Infant Mortality Statistics from the 2008 Period Linked Birth/Infant Death Data Set
⁽³⁾Torch WC. Diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus (DPT) immu-nization: a potential cause of the sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). American Academy of Neurology, 34th Annual Meeting, Apr 25-May 1, 1982. Neurology 32(4): pt. 2
⁽⁴⁾Walker AM, Jick H, Perera DR, Thompson RS, and Knauss TA. Diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis immuniza-tion and sudden infant death syndrome. Am J Public Health 1987; 77: 945–951.
⁽⁵⁾Fine PE and Chen RT. Confounding in studies of adverse reactions to vaccines. Am J Epidemiol 1992; 136: 121–135
⁽⁶⁾Ottaviani G, Lavezze AM, and Matturri L. Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) shortly after hexavalent vaccination: another pathology in suspected SIDS? Virchows Archiv 2006; 448: 100–104.
⁽⁷⁾Thimerosal and the Occurrence of Autism: Negative Ecological Evidence From Danish Population-Based Data
⁽⁸⁾First Fraud: Dr. Poul Thorsen and the original “Danish Study”

Vaccines are proclaimed to save babies’ lives. But is it true? This study provides compelling evidence that it is not, that in reality they’re killers.

by Heidi Stevenson

The reason for giving vaccinations to infants is supposedly to protect them from harm. If that’s true, then it would follow that the countries giving the most vaccines would have the lowest rates of infant mortality.

But they don’t. In fact, a new study documents just the opposite. The Journal of Human & Experimental Toxicology⁽¹⁾ published a study in which the authors carefully compared the vaccination rates of the nations with the lowest infant mortality rates to see if there’s a correlation between number of vaccines and death rates of infants. The results could not be clearer:

The more vaccinations a country gives, the more babies die.

The Study

The table to the right, adapted from the study report, shows the infant mortality rates (IMRs), in terms of deaths per thousand, during the first year of life for the top 34 nations in the world. This data, from the US’s Central Intelligence Agency database, is the study’s source for IMRs.

Four of the nations, Andorra, Liechtenstein, Monaco, and San Marino are quite small, so the number of deaths were too low, resulting in extremely large confidence intervals, a statistical indication of accuracy in the figures. Therefore, they were not included in the study because they held the potential of skewing the results. That left 30 countries for the study.

They obtained the immunization schedules for the first year of life in the other 30 countries, which ranged from a total of 12 in Sweden, Japan, Iceland, Norway, and Denmark, up to 26 in the United States.

Each country’s number of vaccine doses was plotted against the IMR. That graph is not shown here, but does provide a visual correlation between the number of vaccine doses and infant mortality.

The countries were arranged into five groups, as shown here with the number of scheduled vaccines in parentheses:

Group 1: Sweden(12), Japan(12), Iceland(12), Norway(12), Denmark(12), Finland(13)
Group 2: Malta(15), Slovenia(15), South Korea(15), Singapore(17), New Zealand(17)
Group 3: Germany(18), Switzerland(18), Israel(18), Italy(18), France(19), Czech Republic(19), Belgium(19), United Kingdom(19)
Group 4: Spain(20), Portugal(21), Luxembourg(22), Cuba(22), Austria(23), Ireland(23), Greece(23)
Group 5: Netherlands(24), Canada(24), Australia(24), United States(26)

The results of that arrangement are quite dramatic, as shown in the graph to the left. Although there is a wide variance, the trend is unmistakable. The p-value, which is a statistical representation of the likelihood of reaching these results by chance is tiny, only 0.0009, which indicates almost no chance that the results were obtained by chance.

The more vaccines given, the higher the death rate in infants under a year of age.

The authors also discussed the fact that the most important requirements for health in babies are “clean water, proper nutrition, improved sanitation, and better access to health care”. They give examples of nations lacking in these necessities that put scarce money into vaccinations. Examples cited, including number of doses scheduled in the first year, coverage rate, and IMR, are

Gambia: 22 doses, 91-97% coverage, IMR = 68.8
Mongolia: 22 doses, 95-98% coverage, IMR = 39.9

In regard to the focus of vaccines over basic health requirements, the authors state:

As developing nations improve in all of these areas a critical threshold will eventually be reached where further reductions of the infant mortality rate will be difficult to achieve
because most of the susceptible infants that could have been saved from these causes would have been saved.

It’s clear that a nation putting money into vaccinations in a population suffering from inadequate basic necessities is throwing its money away. It could better improve health by providing more of the primary requirements for it.

In spite of the claims that vaccinating infants saves lives, in populations where the basic health requirements are met, the actual effect is contradictory to the promise. The more vaccines given, the higher the death rate.

Purchasing vaccines is not equivalent to purchasing health.

Sudden Infant Death Syndrome

The authors go on to discuss one likely cause of the higher death rate with greater numbers of vaccines, sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), also known as cot death or crib death. This aspect of the study will be covered in an upcoming article.

Source:

⁽¹⁾Infant mortality rates regressed against number of vaccine doses routinely given: Is there a biochemical or synergistic toxicity?

Tagged death rate in babies from vaccines, death rate in infants from vaccines, fda, imr, infant mortality, infant mortality rate, Infant mortality rates regressed against number of vaccine doses routinely given: Is there a biochemical or synergistic toxicity?, Journal of Human & Experimental Toxicology, science, vaccine, vaccine deaths, vaccine mortality, vaccines, vaccines kill

Month: July 2012

Vaccinations Inevitably Cause Autoimmune Diseases: PLoS Study

Study Findings

Autoimmune Tissue Damage

Types of Damage Found

Autoimmune Diseases Are Infectious

Implications

Source:

The Only Credible Cause of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome Is Vaccines

The Attempt to Hide SIDS

Leading Causes of Infant Death

Linking SIDS to Vaccines

Vaccine Deaths

Sources:

The Only Credible Cause of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome Is Vaccines

The Attempt to Hide SIDS

Leading Causes of Infant Death

Linking SIDS to Vaccines

Vaccine Deaths

Sources:

More Vaccines Equal More Infant Deaths: Study Documents

The Study

Sudden Infant Death Syndrome

Source: